Living Donors Online Message Board

Living Donation Discussion and News => Living Donation in the News => Topic started by: Clark on August 15, 2024, 07:37:31 PM

Title: How Do Financial Obstacles Affect Decision-Making Among Potential Living Organ D
Post by: Clark on August 15, 2024, 07:37:31 PM



https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15269248241268679?journalCode=pitb

How Do Financial Obstacles Affect Decision-Making Among Potential Living Organ Donors?
Rebecca J. Mandell, (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15269248241268679?journalCode=pitb#con1) et al

Abstract
Introduction: Living donation increases the organ supply, but associated non-medical expenses can disincentivize donation. Programs aimed at increasing living donation need to better understand how financial obstacles, including lost wages, impact the decision to pursue donation.

Methods/Approach: Forty-eight interviews were conducted and analyzed using a grounded theory approach.

Findings: Three key themes were identified that influenced decision-making: emotional attachment, temporal flexibility, and job security. These themes emerged when dividing interview participants into 3 groups: close relationship donors, broader network donors, and non-directed donors, representing donation to a family member or friend, a specific person they do not know well or at all, or a non-specified individual, respectively. Most close relationship donors wanted to donate regardless of personal financial cost, based on emotional attachment to the recipient. Wage reimbursement did not typically affect their decision-making but could reduce stress. Since non-directed donors did not donate to a specific individual, they could wait to achieve financial stability before donating, if needed. While wage reimbursement might create more proximate stability, non-directed donors had the flexibility to postpone donations until they could independently achieve financial stability. Lacking emotional attachment and temporal flexibility, broader network donors were particularly active decision-makers and most influenced by wage reimbursement. Across all groups, donors with job security were more resolute about donating.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of lost wage reimbursement to facilitate donation and reduce stress, and policies to protect donor job security.