Living Donors Online Message Board
Living Donation Discussion and News => Living Donation in the News => Topic started by: Clark on June 24, 2015, 01:16:14 PM
-
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/111 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/111)
Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jeffrey A Lafranca1 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/111/#ins1), Jan NM IJermans1 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/111/#ins1), Michiel GH Betjes2 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/111/#ins2) and Frank JMF Dor1 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/111/#ins1)*
BMC Medicine 2015, 13:111 doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5
Abstract
Background
Whether overweight or obese end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are suitable for renal transplantation (RT) is often debated. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to systematically investigate the outcome of low versus high BMI recipients after RT.
Methods
Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2014, issue 8). We reviewed four major guidelines that are available regarding (potential) RT recipients. The methodology was in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and written based on the PRISMA statement. The quality assessment of studies was performed by using the GRADE tool. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effects models were used.
Results
After identifying 5,526 studies addressing this topic, 56 studies were included. We extracted data for 37 outcome measures (including data of more than 209,000 RT recipients), of which 26 could be meta-analysed. The following outcome measures demonstrated significant differences in favour of low BMI (<30) recipients: mortality (RR = 1.52), delayed graft function (RR = 1.52), acute rejection (RR = 1.17), 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival (RR = 0.97, 0.95, and 0.97), 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survival (RR = 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99), wound infection and dehiscence (RR = 3.13 and 4.85), NODAT (RR = 2.24), length of hospital stay (2.31 days), operation duration (0.77 hours), hypertension (RR = 1.35), and incisional hernia (RR = 2.72). However, patient survival expressed in hazard ratios was in significant favour of high BMI recipients. Differences in other outcome parameters were not significant.
Conclusions
Several of the pooled outcome measurements show significant benefits for ‘low’ BMI (<30) recipients. Therefore, we postulate that ESRD patients with a BMI >30 preferably should lose weight prior to RT. If this cannot be achieved with common measures, in morbidly obese RT candidates, bariatric surgery could be considered.