The gestational diabetes mellitis is an issue and I'm sure your OB/gyn discussed the increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes later in life due to the GDM. I just did a quick search (I have access to a university research library) and I found two interesting studies on hypertension after GDM and also developing type 2 diabetes. These may be a good starting point to discuss with your family doctor. He/she could even consult with a nephrologist or recommend one to you to speak with since you may have some underlying health issues that need further attention. Doesn't mean you can't continue in the donation process but it is so important for the donor and the recipient to understand the ramifications of an elective surgery. Here at two of the articles and the abstracts.
Good luck with the search. Keep us posted,
Sherri
Increased Risk of Hypertension After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from a large prospective cohort study.Detail Only Available(includes abstract); Tobias DK; Hu FB; Forman JP; Chavarro J; Zhang C; Diabetes Care, 2011 Jul; 34 (7): 1582-4 (journal article - research) ISSN: 0149-5992 PMID: 21593289
Subjects: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes Mellitus, Gestational; Hypertension; Adult: 19-44 years; Female
OBJECTIVE Whether a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of hypertension after the index pregnancy is not well established. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We investigated the association between GDM and subsequent risk of hypertension after the index pregnancy among 25,305 women who reported at least one singleton pregnancy between 1991 and 2007 in the Nurses' Health Study II. RESULTS During 16 years of follow-up, GDM developed in 1,414 women (5.6%) and hypertension developed in 3,138. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed women with a history of GDM had a 26% increased risk of developing hypertension compared with those without a history of GDM (hazard ratio 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.43]; P = 0.0004). These results were independent of pregnancy hypertension or subsequent type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that women with GDM are at a significant increased risk of developing hypertension after the index pregnancy.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bellamy L - Lancet - 23-MAY-2009; 373(9677): 1773-9
MEDLINE® is the source for the citation and abstract of this record
BACKGROUND: Women with gestational diabetes are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but the risk and time of onset have not been fully quantified. We therefore did a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength of association between these conditions and the effect of factors that might modify the risk. METHODS: We identified cohort studies in which women who had developed type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes were followed up between Jan 1, 1960, and Jan 31, 2009, from Embase and Medline. 205 relevant reports were hand searched. We selected 20 studies that included 675 455 women and 10 859 type 2 diabetic events. We calculated and pooled unadjusted relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs for each study using a random-effects model. Subgroups analysed were the number of cases of type 2 diabetes, ethnic origin, duration of follow-up, maternal age, body-mass index, and diagnostic criteria. FINDINGS: Women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with those who had a normoglycaemic pregnancy (RR 7.43, 95% CI 4.79-11.51). Although the largest study (659 164 women; 9502 cases of type 2 diabetes) had the largest RR (12.6, 95% CI 12.15-13.19), RRs were generally consistent among the subgroups assessed. INTERPRETATION: Increased awareness of the magnitude and timing of the risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes among patients and clinicians could provide an opportunity to test and use dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions that might prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in affected women. FUNDING: None.