http://www.mdnews.com/news/2014_06/evaluation-and-recovery-of-living-kidney-donors-.aspxEvaluation and Recovery of Living Kidney Donors following Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
By: Vanessa R. Humphreville, MD; Nagaraju Sarabu, MD; Kenneth J. Woodside, MD, FACS
Kidney transplantation offers significant survival and quality of life benefit for patients with end stage renal disease compared to other treatment options of hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. However, with increased incidence of end stage renal disease in United States, the gap between the demand and the supply of deceased organs has been steadily increasing. As a consequence, the waiting period to receive a deceased-donor kidney transplant continues to increase.
With living donor transplantation, one can have minimal delay to transplant, which even makes preemptive transplantation possible. In addition, outcomes from living donation are significantly better—both for the expected function of the kidney and continued function of the transplanted kidney over time.
Living donor evaluation has received a great deal of attention at the national level and accordingly government agencies involved (CMS and UNOS) have introduced policies to standardize the evaluation of living donors across all transplant centers in the United States. The evaluation starts with assessment of the donor and recipient blood groups and histocompatibility. However, advances in immunosuppressive therapies have made transplantation across many of these barriers possible, so incompatibility does not necessarily prevent someone from donating. In addition, should the donor and recipient not be compatible, there is still the option of enrolling in the kidney donor exchange program. This initial evaluation is followed by a thorough medical and surgical evaluation to ensure that the potential donor is in good health, has normal kidney function, and is free of potentially transmittable infections, malignancies, or other conditions. In addition, a licensed social worker performs a psychosocial evaluation to ensure the donor is free of coercion, and to identify any potential psychiatric disorders that require intervention prior to donation.
Outcomes from living donation are significantly better (than from deceased donation) — both for the expected function of the kidney and continued function of the transplanted kidney over time.
The first living donor nephrectomy was performed by Dr. Joseph Murray, where a man donated to his identical twin. At that time, laparoscopic technique had not yet been developed, so an open technique with a large flank incision was utilized. Unfortunately, this incision was often complicated by incisional hernias and pain, as well as with long hospital stays. In 1995, laparoscopic technique for donor nephrectomies was developed by Dr. Lloyd Ratner and Dr. Louis Kavoussi. The laparoscopic technique has less post operative pain, shorter hospital stay, less need for post-operative narcotics, earlier return to work and daily activities, and more favorable cosmetic outcome while providing identical recipient outcomes to the open technique.
Computed tomography is used to determine vascular and ureteral anatomy as these can vary from donor to donor. The kidneys are evaluated for cysts, masses, stones, size, or any other abnormality. If both kidneys are equal with single vein, artery, and ureter, no stones or cysts, and of similar sizes, the left kidney is preferred, as it has a longer renal vein and is slightly easier to remove. If the kidneys are of unequal sizes, a split glomerular filtration rate is obtained to be sure the more functional kidney remains within the donor.
There are several laparoscopic technique options. The hand-assisted laparoscopic technique, using a hand port in addition to two small port sites, is the most commonly performed in the United States for living donation. The kidney is removed through the existing hand port site. The “total” laparoscopic technique typically utilizes three port sites, one for the camera and two for working instruments, and can be done intraperitoneally or retroperitoneally. This laparoscopic technique can also be performed through a larger single port or with robotic assistance, such as the da Vinci Surgical System. For these approaches, the kidney is typically removed through a lower abdominal transverse incision or through the larger port site.
Incompatibility does not necessarily prevent someone from donating.
The donor is typically in the hospital for two to five days after the surgery. The major symptoms donors experience after leaving the hospital are incisional pain and fatigue. They are usually able to return to work within four to six weeks. The procedure is safe, but has some risks. In addition to the usual risks for general anesthesia and laparoscopic operations, up to a third of patients may have a small rise in their blood pressure. While there is a remote risk of renal failure, it is still rare. Compared to pre-donation, post-donation pregnancies have a somewhat increased risk of miscarriage and preeclampsia. Long term, kidney donors lead normal lives with normal life spans.
Donors initially have scheduled follow-up typical for post-surgical patients. They are seen by the operating surgeon until they have fully recovered from the operation. Donors should be seen by their primary care physician yearly for the rest of their life, which should include age-appropriate health maintenance and blood pressure checks. In addition, transplant centers follow their donors for a minimum of two years. While the exact nature of the two year follow-up program varies by transplant center, follow-up typically is a combination of phone calls, labs, and possible office visits. Many centers, including our own, incorporate office visits with a transplant physician for two years post-donation when feasible. Donor outcomes, like recipient outcomes, are tracked by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, the national regulatory body.